Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with peer-review
Search options not deleted
user 7222
On the evaluation of work (typically, a publication or grant proposal) by the author's peers. This includes: refereeing, which is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication in a journal or conference; peer evaluation of teaching skills; peer review of research grant proposals; and post-publication review of a book or article, as is common in the field of mathematics.
11
votes
How to interpret this rejection email from Journal of American Math Society? Anything to rea...
Here's a positive from this experience that nobody's mentioned:
You got your answer in 2 months. This is actually quite fast for an answer on a mathematics paper. This is much better than waiting 1 …
- 4,230
1
vote
Removing some citations between initial and final submission of paper
A paper is not accepted until the editor says it is. Having a glowing referee's report is not the same as an acceptance; at best it is "provisional acceptance". In this case, the editor wants additi …
- 4,230
6
votes
How much is submission acceptance to high-profile conferences influenced by internal politics?
I completely agree with almost everything xLeitix wrote, except the conclusion. One thing that was not addressed is why your professors told you not to submit to CHI. It's possible that they're givi …
- 4,230
5
votes
How to handle a possibly biased editor?
Expanding on Vincent's excellent answer, the options in this situation are:
Submit to another journal, incorporating the feedback received.
Submit to another journal, ignoring the feedback received. …
- 4,230