Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with peer-review
Search options not deleted
user 53401
On the evaluation of work (typically, a publication or grant proposal) by the author's peers. This includes: refereeing, which is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication in a journal or conference; peer evaluation of teaching skills; peer review of research grant proposals; and post-publication review of a book or article, as is common in the field of mathematics.
5
votes
Secret-Santa-like informal peer reviewing in a small community
PREreview is the closest thing I can think of, and most specifically their PREreview Clubs. It might be worth reaching out to them.
- 1,819
2
votes
What are the advantages and disadvantages of making the review content public?
the author will know exactly who the reviewer is, which apparently harms the blind-review process.
To consider the advantages and disadvantages, I think it helps to understand the motivations beh …
- 1,819
1
vote
Publications that use public review
I don't think there are many journals that currently use public peer review, so it's unlikely that there's a list of them. The most well-known journal that does this, I think, is F1000Research, which …
- 1,819
1
vote
Talking about works under submission without breaching anonymity
The point of blinding authors is to prevent implicit biases from influencing the reviewers' judgements. It's practically impossible to blind properly; reviewers are probably able to deduce your identi …
- 1,819
77
votes
How to handle a possibly biased editor?
Probably not what you want to hear, but... There's the option of submitting it somewhere else?
- 1,819
13
votes
Has there ever been a strike of peer reviewers?
Apart from the Cost of Knowledge, which was a while ago now and had a broader scope than just reviewing, more recently there was No Deal No Review by Finnish researchers. They boycotted the task of pe …
- 1,819
18
votes
Accepted
Can I have ResearchGate organize peer review of my paper?
I think I understand your question now. You've uploaded your article to ResearchGate, and ResearchGate asks you whether it has been peer reviewed. It hasn't, and now you're wondering whether ResearchG …
- 1,819
1
vote
Where to publish supplementary math intensive material for magazine article
I'm not sure about whether it should be peer-reviewed or not, but if not, a place that would be better suited to host this than ResearchGate is FigShare. Using FigShare, your result would actually be …
- 1,819
0
votes
Referee made a mistake but recommended acceptance, what to do?
Would you have explained to the editor when the referee made a mistake that would lead them to reject the paper? If yes, then I think you should do so here as well. Then it's up to the editor to leave …
- 1,819