Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
On the process of submitting a paper for review or publication by a conference or journal. Typical questions with this tag relate to selection of preferred or conflicted reviewers, timeline of the submission process, and typesetting or compilation by the publisher.
5
votes
What is the point of a cover letter in journal submission?
I am also aware that articles can also be published without the cover
letter.
The cover letter is not intended for the reader.
Therein arises the question: why are cover letters written if …
5
votes
Accepted
Status meaning: report on revised version promised by referee
Flippant: It means Referee 2 has promised a report on the revised version.
I'd normally say that this probably means that Referee 2's review is overdue, they have been contacted by the editorial offi …
2
votes
Are papers corrected by the publisher after acceptance?
Some journals will copy-edit papers post-acceptance for typos, clarity, etc. but in my experience if they're asking for "camera-ready" submissions, they're not planning on doing this.
Regardless, you …
6
votes
Isn't it injustice on behalf of editor to assign article status as "under review" when actua...
"Injustice" is a fairly strong way to phrase this.
Is it annoying? Yes. Is it possibly reason to reconsider submitting things to this journal in the future (assuming 10 months is unusual for your fie …
9
votes
Why do journals require authors to provide funding information?
Funding information is often required even when a journal has no open source option to it. The source of funding is a major potential conflict of interest, and as such is a key piece of information in …
10
votes
Do reviewers usually ask for data? (Computer Science/ Data Science / Data Mining)
I have asked, or been asked, for data a vanishingly small but non-zero number of times. But I'm pretty secure in asserting that it's rare.
As for why - I would hope they would specify this when they …
8
votes
How to handle a paper by a reviewer who wants to be paid?
I think it's tremendously hypocritical of the author to submit to a journal knowing other reviewers will do uncompensated labor for his work, but not to do the same for theirs.
That being said, "bein …
18
votes
Why do some conferences with double blind review ask for author names when submitting the pa...
Likely so they can track the papers internally by author. It prevents, for example, a submission being sent out to a reviewer who is on the paper.'
Double-blind just means that the reviewers are unkn …
18
votes
Accepted
Double blind review allowing arXiv submissions
Wouldn't that effectively constitute a violation of the double-blind
review policy?
Clearly not, as they state that it doesn't violate the policy.
Does it break double-blinding? Yes. But the i …
9
votes
When is it prudent to argue against a suggested revision to a journal paper?
My experience in this regard, being in Epidemiology as a field and having both successfully and unsuccessfully pushed back against reviewers:
You are best served arguing against a reviewers requests …
2
votes
Is it bad to ask the editor about the status of a submission on seeing that referees' report...
Echoing other responses, one week is really not all that much time for a paper to be sitting on an editor's desk, and it's not worth sending a query.
The only exception to this is if the paper is exp …
4
votes
Why conference chair asks for accepted papers sources?
While we obviously do not know the Chair's intent (unless she happens to be a stack exchange poster), the most likely situation to me is that there's some sort of formatting related issue (or possibly …
2
votes
How to describe a paper for which you have not yet submitted revisions in CV?
A. Scientist. My Brilliant, Albeit Slightly Flawed Work. Journal of Sciencing. (in revision)
Is the standard way I note these on my CV, when I feel like doing so.
0
votes
How to present projects that will soon be published on CV?
It depends on the nature of "Soon to be published".
For journals that have been accepted, or have been sent back for revisions, you can consider something like
Smith, J. My Amazing Science: A Bayesi …
9
votes
Accepted
Why do computer science students working in computational biology domain need to give biolog...
I am always in a hurry to do the same. What I have noticed for this
field is that if I predict something, I need to provide biological
validation for my result. Why so?
Because this is how on …