Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with peer-review
Search options not deleted
user 177811
On the evaluation of work (typically, a publication or grant proposal) by the author's peers. This includes: refereeing, which is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication in a journal or conference; peer evaluation of teaching skills; peer review of research grant proposals; and post-publication review of a book or article, as is common in the field of mathematics.
0
votes
Should I recommend a reviewer that I have no contact with?
I am certain most - if not all - of us have experienced this at some point in our academic careers. In the event that I am unable to review a piece, and I am aware of a colleague/peer whose area of ex …
5
votes
Should I wait to send a revised manuscript?
I, myself, have done this, and it was never a problem (a few times, the turnaround was same-day). In fact, I’m willing to bet the editor appreciates your expeditiousness, as it also speeds things up o …
1
vote
What to do with a mathematical article rejected from a journal because the anonymous referee...
This is not a reason to not continue to pursue publication further. Make good on all of the feedback you received, and send it to a new journal for publication consideration. There IS a right home for …
1
vote
Reviewer rejects a paper and then publishes the same results as their own?
I would believe that the original author, at this point, has enough documentation to "prove" that the published material was lifted from the rejected (original) submission. In such an instance, the pu …
0
votes
Should I wait until after peer review to apply for a change of authorship?
You can absolutely wait until after the peer review process is completed. If the reviews are favorable, great! Change your authorship status then. If the reviews are not favorable, that will be your o …
6
votes
Supervisor does not want to contact reviewer after publication
It is rather uncommon to attempt to contact a reviewer post-review. Naturally, there are numerous ethical concerns to be considered (including, but not limited to, anonymity). What would be the point …