The journal Science has two sections for submission, Research articles and Commentary. http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/prep/gen_info.xhtml

Under commentary, there is a section for 'Policy Forum'. Unlike 'Education Forum' there is nothing explicit about research related to Policy. If one submits (not invited) a manuscript to Policy Forum, is this considered peer reviewed publication? Is there a difference in citation both in format of a citation and if it is common to cite a manuscript published in Commentary?


The general discussion for the Commentary section mentions this:

Commentary material may be peer-reviewed at the Editors' discretion.

If you look up a sample Policy Forum paper online, you can download the citation information. For example,

Yucca Mountain  
Rodney C. Ewing and Allison Macfarlane 
Science 26 April 2002:  296 (5568), 659-660. [DOI:10.1126/science.1071886]

and then in various formats. Here's the BibTeX entry:

author = {Ewing, Rodney C. and Macfarlane, Allison}, 
title = {Yucca Mountain},
volume = {296}, 
number = {5568}, 
pages = {659-660}, 
year = {2002}, 
doi = {10.1126/science.1071886}, 
URL = {http://www.sciencemag.org/content/296/5568/659.short}, 
eprint = {http://www.sciencemag.org/content/296/5568/659.full.pdf}, 
journal = {Science} 

In general, a "Comment" is always a publication. However, your question is whether it should be listed in someone's publication list, presumably along side peer-reviewed articles. I believe the relevant criterion, as mkennedy suggests, is if the comment has itself been peer-reviewed. When yes, it can go in the regular list; if not, then it should presumably be relegated to a "additional publications" list or something of that type.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.