Search Results

In general, yes, absolutely. People expand on previous research all the time - whether their own or someone else's. Of course, you will need to cite and refer to your earlier publication. The question …

As an analogy, psychologists routinely use the same questionnaire over and over again. (As just one example, take Beck's Depression Inventory.) These are well established in the literature, and nobody …

Beware that your proposed course of action can backfire. That lower tier journal that you submit to instead of addressing the reviewers' concerns may very well invite the very same reviewers as the or …

I am an Associate Editor at the International Journal of Forecasting, and yes, this can absolutely happen. Unfortunately, potential reviewers are sometimes not very good about even replying whether th …

The simplest possibility would be that your submitted review got lost in the system, or the editor overlooked or forgot about it. This happens sometimes and is of course frustrating: Reviewing a revis …

This kind of typo is usually absolutely fixable in the proof stage. Just point it out like any other typo. Good on you to read your proofs carefully enough to find it!

Academics typically have a subsection "publications", possibly even as a separate document. Especially if you have been around for a while, this can become quite long. … However, at the beginning of your academic career, it might make sense to have it as a subsection of your "general" CV, unless wherever you submit it requests a separate list of publications. …

As a bit of background, I am a statistician and have visibility into psychology and medical research, e.g., theses my psychologist wife (with an affiliation in the local medical school) supervises, an …

Even if you graduate without publications, that is still better than quitting 80% through. Finishing the Ph.D. shows that you persist in face of difficulties. That is a valuable skill. …

Typically, "the state of the art" is not monolithic. Rather, it consists of multiple strands or aspects. If your paper addresses the application of technique foo to problem bar, then "the state of the …

I agree with the consensus in the comments: you really should try to collaborate with an expert in Machine Learning (or, as I would really recommend, in statistics, but I'm biased). On the one hand, a …

If the median is 10 days, that means that half of decisions take longer than that. Plus, among the half of decisions that get taken in 10 days or less are presumably all the desk rejections that happe …

On the one hand, this is really something an advisor should be helping you with, and one of the reasons why there is typically an advisor-advisee relationship at early stages of a young researcher's c …

Be very careful about this. Many such emails are automated spam: people automatically scrape recently published papers and automatically generate such "invitation" emails. This mainly tries to get you …

I would agree that this is strange. For one, a rewrite of this scope would invalidate all the reviews. Of course, as is often emphasized on this site and elsewhere, the editor can basically disregard …