5

I recently submitted a journal article and it is under review. I have not heard back yet. I am in contact with a potential collaborator, and I think it would be beneficial for her to read I have in the submitted paper. Is it advisable to send out preprints that have yet to be published? Rejection of a submitted manuscript is always a possibility.

  • 6
    This is very common in math, where papers take a long time to be reviewed. In fact, the second thing I do after submitting a preprint to a journal is send it out to colleagues/mentors I think would find it relevant. Like "Hi, how are you, this preprint may be of interest." (The first thing is post to arXiv.) – user37208 Feb 26 '16 at 18:37
  • 1
    It's advisable to do it even before submission. See e.g. academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1608/… and academia.stackexchange.com/questions/14882/… – David Ketcheson Feb 26 '16 at 18:52
4

I frequently privately share pre-prints that have not been published anywhere (not even pre-print servers) with colleagues who I know and trust. I often won't say where it's under review, however, just because it's kind of pointless to say a place it might be rejected from.

In fields where pre-print archives like arXiv.org are used, once you've put it up in such a pre-print server, it's got a public date stamp and it's entirely reasonable and safe to share with anybody. Likewise, once a paper has been accepted and is just waiting to appear, I feel it safe to share pre-prints privately.

With something that is under review and not on a pre-print server, however, I would not share it with people who I do not already know and trust.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.