Timeline for Sending preprints to colleagues
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 26, 2016 at 3:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/713563988093755392 | ||
Mar 2, 2016 at 19:04 | vote | accept | LCW | ||
Feb 26, 2016 at 21:26 | answer | added | jakebeal | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 26, 2016 at 18:52 | comment | added | David Ketcheson | It's advisable to do it even before submission. See e.g. academia.stackexchange.com/questions/1608/… and academia.stackexchange.com/questions/14882/… | |
Feb 26, 2016 at 18:37 | comment | added | user37208 | This is very common in math, where papers take a long time to be reviewed. In fact, the second thing I do after submitting a preprint to a journal is send it out to colleagues/mentors I think would find it relevant. Like "Hi, how are you, this preprint may be of interest." (The first thing is post to arXiv.) | |
Feb 26, 2016 at 18:24 | history | asked | LCW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |