4

I submitted a research paper in pure mathematics in a good (in the sense of science citation indexing) journal published by a university in the USA. It has been over 3 years since I submitted it.

In the mean-time, the third round of revision (a minor revision) was submitted two and a half months back. The first round of review took almost 2 years, then a minor revision for the second round of review took almost a year. The final and third revision was submitted two and half months back. The review reports were positive every time. The last time (two and half months back), the editor said that the referees will inform soon. After two months, I gave another polite reminder (15 days ago) about the status of the paper, but I received no reply from the editor. I understand, an editor might have been busy and might have been missed or forgot to reply.

If I give another follow-up email to the editor, would it be polite or the editor mind it? If I write a follow-up email, what should be the email's message?

Some more information: I am a graduate student, and will be defending my thesis soon. So, a few publications will help me for the next step of my career. The paper is almost 30 pages paper of fundamental mathematics, that is, mostly theorems, lemmas etc, not many figures. However, in my opinion, the mathematics involved in the paper are not very difficult to review by an expert.

4
  • 5
    Do you mean that the first submission of this paper was over 3 years ago?
    – Buffy
    Commented 2 days ago
  • 2
    @Buffy, yes exactly. It is three years one month now
    – Learner
    Commented 2 days ago
  • And, do you mean that the thesis was submitted to the journal? Or to the university?
    – Buffy
    Commented 2 days ago
  • @Buffy, no I just submitted an article, not my thesis. My thesis have other papers as well. My PhD thesis is submitted to my university.
    – Learner
    Commented 2 days ago

2 Answers 2

9

I wouldn't worry so much about politeness, since you have a need. But this journal seems a bit (ha ha, more than a bit) lethargic. I doubt that you can expect anything to happen soon.

In a note to the editor, ask for the prospects of publication within, say 6 (or whatever) months. Maybe you will get an answer. I hope so. Mention that you are graduating soon and a published article will help in the job market.

Withdrawal is an option, but it probably won't speed you up by much if anything by submitting elsewhere. Yes, math publication can be slow, but this is a bit much. Ask. Keep the wording polite, but don't worry about the politeness of the request itself.

Normally asking for follow up in two weeks is a bit soon, but I think this is an exception.

2
  • Maybe I should one more week before sending another reminder. The reply from the editor was two and half months back when I submitted the third revision. But didn't receive reply of the last email that i sent 15 day back.
    – Learner
    Commented 2 days ago
  • 1
    Waiting one more week will be the Christmas break in many parts of the world...
    – usr1234567
    Commented yesterday
3

While I understand that math publishing moves much more slowly than most other fields, the pace here seems so lackadaisical that I don't think you have much to lose by being a little pushy--and things do happen. A journal lost a short paper of mine for a year[1]: the editor and assistants kept getting reassigned and this particular paper fell through the cracks. Like you, I held off on sending reminders in the interests of politeness, but I wish I had started sooner.

However, I would caution you that the timing of your emails is a little unfortunate. Two weeks ago, many western universities were starting to wrap up the academic term, setting final exams, papers, etc. That's finishing up and we're now heading into the holidays. If your paper is being handled by an academic, rather than a full-time professional editor, it might be on the back-burner while they deal with seasonal things and/or vacation.

Thus, if you don't send something in the next day or so, I would suggest waiting until January 6.

[1] In biology, this is essentially an eternity.

1
  • 1
    yes you are right, I have that in my mind.
    – Learner
    Commented yesterday

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .