I am a computer professional. I submitted a paper to the top conference in our field. I just received comments from reviewers. Now is the rebuttal stage.
There are six reviewers in total.
2 Accecpt, 2 weak accecpt, one weak reject and one reject.
The reviewer who gave the reject comment obviously had a problem with the conceptual understanding of the paper. The remaining reviewers think the idea of the paper is interesting, but the evaluation is not good.
How should I reply? Is there any chance for this paper?