My paper met acceptance (through email notification from editor) with one reviewer requiring a minor change which is not minor according to my perception and would revise all my figures and results. The detail is:
Editor’s comments:
Your manuscript entitled "xxxxxxxxxxxx" has been accepted for publication in IEEE xxxxxxxxx. The comments of the reviewers who reviewed your manuscript are included at the foot of this letter. We ask that you make changes to your manuscript based on those comments, before uploading final files.
Reviewer 1 comments
Recommendation: Accept (minor edits)
Comments: I think the authors have either answered all my questions or made the relevant revision concerning the suggestions raised by the reviewer. I have no further comments
Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes
Is the paper technically sound?: Yes
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes
Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes
Reviewer: 2
Recommendation: Accept (minor edits)
Comments: The responses of the authors are satisfactory. But they can incorporate the sensing error parameter to bring more realistic scenario in their model.
Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes
Is the paper technically sound?: Yes
Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: yes
Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes
Should I mention that I will undertake the recommendation in my future work? If I do so, can it lead to rejection of my paper after acceptance?