Does giving a good conference talk affect the acceptance of future submissions?

Question

Sort of a follow-up question to Does giving an easily-understood talk make the audience think you did something simple?

Let's say Alice goes to Big Name Conference V and gives a great talk. Everyone understood what she did, why she did it and what she's going to do next. Does that make it so that:

• The organizers of Big Name Conference VI are more likely to invite her as a speaker;
• If that doesn't happen, any submission she makes to Big Name Conference VI is more likely to be accepted?

If the answers to the above is "yes", does that imply that if she submits to Big Name Conference VI and is rejected, then her talk at Big Name Conference V was probably poor?

Answer 1

Does that make it more probable that:

The organizers of Big Name Conference VI are more likely to invite her as a speaker;

Yea, obviously a person who develops a reputation for giving great talks is more likely to be invites to give talks than a person who has not developed such a reputation.

However, one good talk will probably not increase the probability of getting to be an invited speaker by a huge amount. It will be a very slight increase. And Alice still needs to be well-respected as a researcher, not just a speaker, otherwise she almost certainly will not be invited to give a talk.

If that doesn't happen, any submission she makes to Big Name Conference VI is more likely to be accepted?

Not in the areas I’m familiar with. Typically acceptance of submitted papers/abstracts to conferences is based on the scientific quality of the submission and not on speaking ability. I’m guessing this is true universally across the STEM areas. Perhaps in humanities, social sciences and other non-STEM areas things are different in this respect.