Skip to main content
added 253 characters in body
Source Link
Bob
  • 3.5k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 53

I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase. One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.

Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I was confident that the final notifications would be announced before the conference X takes place, however, i didn't consider the fact that conferences would announce their accepted papers on their website 1-2 months prior to the conference! :D

I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!

I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!

I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase. One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.

Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!

I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!

I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase. One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.

Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I was confident that the final notifications would be announced before the conference X takes place, however, i didn't consider the fact that conferences would announce their accepted papers on their website 1-2 months prior to the conference! :D

I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!

I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!

Copyediting
Source Link
Anyon
  • 29.8k
  • 8
  • 93
  • 132

I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and iI need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase. One reviewer (whichwho also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.

Well, iI cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but iI mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!

I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC anand also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!

I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and i need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase. One reviewer (which also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.

Well, i cited my paper Y which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X without using my name, but i mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!

I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC an also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!

I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase. One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.

Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!

I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!

Source Link
Bob
  • 3.5k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 53

How to respond in the rebuttal phase when the reviewer's concern is a blind review issue?

I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and i need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase. One reviewer (which also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.

Well, i cited my paper Y which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X without using my name, but i mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!

I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC an also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!