Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 7075

On the evaluation of work (typically, a publication or grant proposal) by the author's peers. This includes: refereeing, which is often used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication in a journal or conference; peer evaluation of teaching skills; peer review of research grant proposals; and post-publication review of a book or article, as is common in the field of mathematics.

26 votes
Accepted

Average time alloted for manuscript review across disciplines

For mathematics, here's the latest survey done by American Mathematical Society: http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1268.pdf You can find median times from submission/acceptance to acceptance/ …
Yuichiro Fujiwara's user avatar
35 votes

Should I agree to review papers as a postdoc?

I have served as a referee for various math and related journals since I was a graduate student. I'm a postdoc now, and during this career phase, I have refereed way more papers than I wrote. I put on …
Yuichiro Fujiwara's user avatar
7 votes

How to offer a reviewer to be co-author?

I also have an experience of being asked to become a co-author by the authors of one paper I refereed. It wasn't a journal of the PNAS caliber, but it's a good specialized journal. I don't know exact …
Yuichiro Fujiwara's user avatar