Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with open-science
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 40589
Questions concerning "Open Science", or research done in full view of the public eye, with a focus on accessibly and reproducibility, including tools to enable such access.
35
votes
Will a paper be retracted if a flaw in released software code invalidates its central idea?
Will there be any positive gain thanks to the publishing of the code to me?
Publishing the code is necessary to make the calculation reproducible and the results verifiable. If I were the referee of …
CommunityBot
- 1
32
votes
Why don't publication venues systematically make the LaTeX source of papers available?
I suspect that this is a solution in search of a problem. Most likely journals aren't making LaTeX versions of papers available because they don't see a demand for such a service from the side of the …
- 202k