I'm in an undegraduate program in the US where group work is a major focus in most classes. Faculty often cite the important benefits of knowing how to collaborate in teams, claiming how educational research findings strongly support collaborative learning.

I'm also a TA in a course in the department, and in our learning course, we had sections in which we strongly focused on the pitfalls of group work and how to improve the learning process (e.g. strategies to divide work, how to moderate conflict, with people who don't pull their weight, etc.). We were assigned a few papers on research about collaborative work (some even written by faculty in the department).

In all these papers, there always seem to be a behavioral assumption that makes the situation utopic. For instance, among the good strategies in papers were things such as: "Divide work early into task groups" or "Create a time estimate for the semester for every task." This is good advice, but not all students follow or care about these strategies. Otherwise, everybody would be getting As, no? Thus, despite my qualms about how the research was conducted, it seems that theoretically group work would be ideal, but in practice it is more often than not negative.

Is there any research that has found that group work has more often been negative in academic settings? Or, perhaps, given the constraints (i.e. group is assigned, members don't know each other) or types of behavior (i.e. member who doesn't care about grade as long it's above C, member who just drops class) that exist in university classrooms, is positive group work unrealistic?

Additional related questions:

  • If there exists research that supports individual learning. Why is group work still insisted on? From the point of view of the professor, wouldn't it be preferable to assign a project (and if individual/group work is not a concern), let students organically generate their groups if they desire to do so, or work individually if they are willing to undertake the task alone?
  • If there isn't research that supports individual learning. What are some of the most important papers which have established group work as the desired learning strategy? Are there any popular experiments in the field of education related to this topic (e.g. famous/popular such as Zimbardo's experiments in Psychology)?
  • 9
    Since you probably know how to search for academic research, I'm going to venture that the point of this question is that you hate doing group work and you're looking for people who agree with you. Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 1:50
  • 6
    @ElizabethHenning I foresaw that such a remark would arise and tried to present my question in the most inquisitive way possible without sounding cynical or to come across as you described. Indeed, I believe I could formulate queries on Google until I get papers that speak to the issue at hand. However, because I have no idea about the layout of the field of education, I will not be able to appropriately judge what are good papers or conferences, or what's appropriate methodology, etc. If anything, without advise from people who know, this would just result in more confirmation bias.
    – aedcv
    Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 2:08
  • 3
    @ElizabethHenning Secondly, to your point, I believe that most questions asked in this forum would be answerable by the individuals who ask them given enough time. Because questions shouldn't be seeking opinions in stackexchange, then the facts presented must exist somewhere. Why shouldn't everybody just go search for answers rather than ask questions? If my question is poorly formulated or could be improved, do offer me advise on how to improve it, so that we can continue improving this community.
    – aedcv
    Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 2:12
  • 5
    The best answer to your question is still to search the relevant databases or to ask a reference librarian if you don't know what they are. I'm also wondering why you don't ask the faculty at your school who have done work on this, since they are far more likely to be knowledgeable about this question than people here. Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 2:28
  • 4
    I think the close-vote (off-topic/shopping question) is not justified: for academia-related topics, we have a dedicated tag "reference request" ("Questions requesting a supporting document or citation for a specific query."). Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 7:35

1 Answer 1


I found this study, which is a pretty interesting read: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~jbryson/CBRReport.pdf In the end it is proved that group work isn't beneficial. Most of the students who worked by them selves scored higher than the groups, by showing and explaining there work, but a bunch of others got the question wrong. The groups were scattered in the middle scores, meaning that they got more answers right than the individuals, but the individuals had a better understanding on how to solve the problem. When students work in groups, they get more questions right, but they don't understand what they are learning. This proves that it is better to work as individuals, since more students will understand what they are doing, although more will get lower scores. Also, the groups, probably only got more correct, since the students are collaborating and helping each other, which doesn't show that they understand what they are doing.

  • Part of the issue with your study is it used randomized group membership, if students in a group are not of similar ability then they end up offloading the work on the most skilled. Also the really high pretest scores indicate they were not teaching the students something they did not already know making the assessment meaningless.
    – John
    Commented Nov 26, 2017 at 16:34
  • Another bad thing: they didn't disclose the actual questions, thus leaving everybody in the total darkness about exactly what skills have been tested (of course, they can claim whatever they want in the introduction in this respect, but I prefer to form my own opinions). The addition of the picture of the "random number generator" to the text makes a good laugh without doubt, but I would rather have an opportunity to look at a few other things.
    – fedja
    Commented Nov 26, 2017 at 23:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .