2

Background : I did both my bachelor's and master's degree from the same institute, let's call it institute X. I liked it there during my bachelor's and since very few institutes near by offered a master's degree in the subject I wanted I joined it. It is a decision I regret. The level of the course and syllabus was very poor and most lectures couldn't give us proper guidance on the books one should refer to for self study. I did manage to find out through a very helpful professor from a highly reputed institute how to go about things and managed to get in to a good institute for a PhD. Now I am on verge of finishing and plan on applying to institute Y for teaching position.

Question : I am bound to be asked by the interview panel of institute Y why I am choosing to apply for a teaching position there and not in my own institute. What is the best way to answer?

The real answer to the question is that standards in institute X are falling and the academic environment there is deteriorated. More importance is being given to looking good on paper than to teaching. For example, they show statistics of how you have such a great number of students doing exceedingly well in exams but having written those exams myself I know that they aren't all that challenging to begin with. There are similar exaggerated facts that make the institute look good on paper. I know that I won't be happy there unless there is a radical change.

I don't think I should be saying all this to an interview panel though (or should I?). I really want to give an honest answer but I certainly don't want to come off as some one who insults their Alma Mater even if what I say is true. So what is the best way to answer? Or is there a polite way to say that I don't like the atmosphere there?

EDIT - I would like to add that I am from Bangalore, India.

Thank you.

5
  • 5
    "I am bound to be asked by the interview panel of institute Y why I am choosing to apply for a teaching position there and not in my own institute" - in my field and geographical location, it would be totally bizarre to ask this in an interview.
    – ff524
    Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 4:55
  • Well it isn't a bizarre question in my geographical location so it would be really nice if someone could use their imagination and give me some advice. Thank you.
    – R_D
    Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 4:59
  • 1
    The general rule is to replace every phrase of the type "they are worse than you" with one of the type "you are better than they" but otherwise tell the truth (though you are never obliged to tell the whole truth). Beyond that the answer, indeed, depends on many details you haven't provided.
    – fedja
    Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 5:06
  • 3
    I'm obviously missing something. How does Y even know that you're not applying to X? Surely you're not applying to only one department?
    – JeffE
    Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 10:15
  • 1
    It's not a good idea to give people advice based on "imagination." I could imagine all sorts of situations each of which I would give very different advice for! Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 14:52

2 Answers 2

8

If they ask, be diplomatic. Slagging off your old institution doesn't send a good message. Something like:

While I enjoyed my time there and feel they helped me to grow into an independent researcher, I'm now looking to gain experience of working in a different department in order to develop these skills further.

might work, if true (or at least true enough for a job interview).

Then expand on this by explaining why you chose to apply to this new institution, rather than elsewhere, by explaining what you see as their positives.

1
  • I agree that it is better to talk diplomatically about the previous institution. Ultimately, an interview panel is not looking for the reasons for why an applicant didn't choose other universities. Instead, they are interested in why the applicant chose their university. Commented Sep 6, 2017 at 14:36
1

You are leaving X because they are too focused on statistics and not so much on good teaching. Instead, you are joining Y. One should thus assume that you did some research and know how Y deals with teaching. This can be used as an argument, e.g.

I think that it is important to put high priority to good, quality teaching. As I read on your homepage/as professor A from your institute told me when I met him last week/..., you seem to agree.

In this way, you don't blame your former institute, as you don't say that they have bad teaching there. Maybe they just have "regular" teaching and you are looking for the best there is, meaning institute Y?
Furthermore, I would suggest to find out about teaching policies at Y if you haven't already, you don't want to end up at an institute that is even worse than X, do you?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .