I'm coding some transcripts at the moment and the data I am working with is not anonymized yet. I'm a research assistant, I did not collect the data and I am obviously not the PI. What strikes me is that I know some of the people interviewed so it's a bit sensitive for me to be coding that non-anonymized data.

Which has me wondering, especially in cases where the data is analyzed by a big team, when does the data typically get anonymized and who does it? Would it be common to ask the transcriber to do it?

  • Depends on how the study is blinded (e.g., single blind or double blind).
    – StrongBad
    Jul 2, 2017 at 1:15
  • @StrongBad From my understanding, neither, as it's not an experiment (qualitative analysis of interviews) but feel free to correct me on that one. Though it might be worthwhile to answer for those cases as the question may be worthwhile for others. I'm working on interviews in social sciences so it's for when participants have requested anonymity.
    – curious
    Jul 2, 2017 at 1:24
  • 1
    @StrongBad The OP is asking about anonymizing data for privacy reasons, not for blinding. Some approaches to blinding could anonymize as a side effect, but you could easily have a completely double-blinded experiment where the data are not anonymized, and vice-versa.
    – Bryan Krause
    Jul 2, 2017 at 8:25

1 Answer 1


All aspects of the privacy and data security of the research are the ultimate responsibility of the PI. (Though of course, you should not take this to mean that you have no responsibilities yourself!) In your case it would be a good idea to report your concern directly to the PI for the study, to ensure that it is known. It is fairly common for research work to be undertaken without anonymising the data, unless this is required for the purposes of blinding protocols in the study. However, if there is a reasonable prospect of researchers accessing sensitive data for people they know, then the PI should really be applying some anonymisation protocol to prevent this.

As a research assistant for the study, you have a responsibility to maintain confidentiality of the information you access, and you should also avoid specifically accessing the data for a person you know, other than for bona fide research purposes. In the event that there is a data breach in your study (e.g., a research assistant disclosing data outside of the team), your PI could definitely find him/herself in hot water.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .