I am a PhD student applying to academic faculty positions in mid-sized institutions in the United States. I am writing research statements for ecological/environmental positions with a major focus on my current (graduate) research and my plans for extending my research in the future. However, I had almost 5 years of research experience prior to coming to grad school (4 of the 5 were while I was an undergraduate).

My question is, should I mention or incorporate in any way the research I was involved with as prior to graduate school? I am especially curious about work done as an undergraduate.

Also, does the quality of work matter? for example, I researched and published an undergraduate thesis but also worked as research assistant on a number of projects.

  • "Also, does the quality of work matter?" Um, yes. Commented Feb 2, 2016 at 16:34
  • @PeteL.Clark I guess I should clarify that point. I don't really mean the quality of the work produce, but rather the quality of my involvement/input. For example, as I mention, designing/publishing my own undergrad thesis vs. being significantly involved in a project as a research assistant Commented Feb 2, 2016 at 17:12

2 Answers 2


Do you feel that your undergrad research is a significant part of your research profile, or tied in with your current research interests? If so, then yes. If not, then I don't see it adding much value to your research statement. For research schools, you want your research statement to be impressive, not watered down with minor results. I was involved in 1-2 (unpublished---1 became a paper, which got accepted, but I decided not to publish) research projects as an undergrad, but I did not even think to mention them in my research statement. Note any papers you published will appear on your CV, so the committee will already see these.

However, one place you might mention it is in connection with the prospect of supervising undergrad research. You can say what a good experience it was for you, and how you would like to be involved in it on the other side now. This could come up either your teaching statement and/or your research statement, depending on your application. (I might put it in my research statement if the projects I was already discussing lead to good projects for undergrads.) This could be a boon, depending on how much the departments you're applying to value undergrad research.


You should mention it (You still feel proud of it, don't you? Also, "full disclosure" is key, don't try to hide good/bad aspects of your career, they will come out and bite you in the worst way.), but emphasize your later performance. They are interested in your future research performance, of which presumably your recent performance is a better predictor than what came long before. Sure, seeing that the candidate has long be involved in research is a bonus, but I'd not consider it tipping the scales.

No, only tangentially involved in search committees, don't just take my word for it.

  • 2
    With respect, I disagree thoroughly with this. The point of a research statement is not to mention every research that you feel "proud" of, it's to display whatever research best makes the case that your research strength and research velocity (and research acceleration...) are extremely high. Nor does the principle of "full disclosure" at all apply to selecting what to talk about in a research statement! Surely all of the OP's academic publications will appear on their CV, so there is simply no issue of disclosure here. Overall: not good advice, I'm afraid. Commented Feb 2, 2016 at 16:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .