13

The arXiv version of my article has two citations. Now that my paper is published in a journal, I want to know if these citations will be transferred to the journal version? Should I withdraw my article from arXiv?

  • 12
    Don't withdraw your article from the Arxiv. It is meant to be an archive. Withdrawing something is generally taken to indicate the original was too wrong to be corrected (the other major case is a paper that has been subsumed by another). – Jessica B Aug 17 '15 at 10:16
  • 6
    Note you can't withdraw from arxiv once the article is public. You can place a notification on the article with the word "withdrawn" in it, but the article is still there for everyone to read and cite however they want. – user4512 Aug 17 '15 at 13:52
14

No, the citations will not change just because the paper is published in a journal (however, if the citations are themselves in preprints, then contacting the authors to make them aware of the publication would make sense, and would probably make them either update the citations in the preprint or at least change them for the final publication).

However, what you can do is update the arXiv paper to add a mention of where the paper has been published.

  • Even if you mention this to Arxiv, google scholar won't give correct bibtex info. I am going to avoid Arxiv in the future. Your university should offer a local preprint service, those have worked fine for me. It seems like Arxiv just wants to self-promote to me. Contacting authors of each article that cites you does not seem feasible to me. – dorien Jul 11 '17 at 4:39
  • @dorien I don't see how a local preprint service would be better. Nor do I have any idea what you mean by arXiv self-promoting. Nor for that matter what bibtex info you mean. – Tobias Kildetoft Jul 11 '17 at 4:44
11

I'm guessing that your concern is whether the citations from the two versions will be combined in a citation database. The answer is that it depends on the citation database, and whether it considers the possibility of something like arXiv preprints, which cannot be taken for granted. Google Scholar certainly does handle this case: it will detect similarity between the two versions and attempt to merge them (or you can do it manually if it doesn't detect it on its own). I don't know whether other databases such as ISI or PubMed do, however.

  • 7
    ISI doesn't consider arXiv versions at all. – Arno Aug 17 '15 at 10:59
  • 6
    Similarly, MathSciNet does not include anything from the arXiv; papers are indexed once the are published. – Oswald Veblen Aug 17 '15 at 11:37
  • @OswaldVeblen: this is not quite true anymore, MathSciNet will eventually link arXiv references to the pubished version using "cf. MRXXXXX" (or attempt to, anyway). However I am not sure whether such links are counted in their citation counts; I believe they are not. – Tom Church Aug 17 '15 at 22:31
  • 2
    @OswaldVeblen, and that unfortunate omission in MathSciNet is why by now it is primarily useful for historical, rather than contemporary, searches and such. – paul garrett Aug 17 '15 at 22:31
  • 1
    Just puzzling over this same issue. It seems that as of early 2019 MathSciNet does count a cite to the arXiv version of my paper as it if was to the paper. They seem to be doing this via the MRXXXXX reference as Tom Church indicated. – Michael Murray Feb 3 at 23:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.