I just received an email of my paper which was submitted to a conference. The paper submission webpage has the following type of status:
active (under review), discuss, withdrawn, rejected, minor revision, major revision, accepted, no show, published
The status of my paper shows "accepted". However, the reviewer of my papers have pointed out some shortcomings of my paper. (Personally, I think what the comments meant is that it would be nice to have things include in my paper). So the question is, do I need to make that adjustment for the "camera-ready" version? Is it true that only if the status says "minor revision" then you will have to adjust according to the reviewer's comment?