If someone is on a tenure track in a science or engineering department at U.S. institution (Tier 1, if that makes the question more focused), and it is time to review his case to be tenured and promoted to associate professor, what is a typical range for the number of the external reviewers for his file? Does the number vary if the case is for professorship promotion?

  • 4
    Each university sets its own policy in this regard, so I don't think there will be any general answer. At my institution the number is 2. – Nate Eldredge Feb 24 '15 at 8:17
  • 3
    @xLeitix while I agree there is variation, I think this is still a good question. I would love to see an answer that mentions that the committee often wants references from both people you and they select, the academic rank and field of these people, and the range in number. I doubt anyone school is more than 20 and I think Nate's school sets the lower bar. – StrongBad Feb 24 '15 at 10:41
  • 1
    Voting to close - even with the restrictions put in, the answer is going to be "It depends". – Fomite Feb 24 '15 at 19:15
  • 1
    I've adjusted the question to be about typical ranges, which I think should be answerable, as many highly-ranked US institutions are likely to have similar processes. – jakebeal Feb 24 '15 at 19:50
  • 2
    The University of Michigan's College of Literature, Science, and the Arts requires at least 6 external letters, of which at least 5 must be from "arm's length" reviewers (not co-authors and not having held an appointment in the same unit as the candidate in the last 10 years); at least 2 of those 5 must be reviewers not suggested by the candidate. We (in the math department) usually have significantly more than the required minimum of letters. – Andreas Blass Feb 24 '15 at 23:11

The actual number varies by institution and, frankly, does not matter that much. The real questions are:

  • Are you known in a community? Do people in your academic community generally know of you and, more importantly, your work.
  • Does the university want to keep you? It is always possible to find people who will write either effusively positive or cynically negative reviews of anyone and everyone. Such reviewers are generally known to people who seek their reviews.

The first question is loosely tied to the visibility of your research, and the second question is loosely tied to your value within the university (often including teaching, grant funding, collegiality, and the like).


At my institution, (which typically takes its cues from Tier 1 US institutions and is led by scientists who all come from Tier 1 US institutions), the dean solicits 6 names from the faculty member and another 6 names are determined by him or people in the program. From this list of 12, it's necessary to obtain at least 6 letters for the case. It goes without saying that none of the 12 names can have any significant ties to the candidate. All of the 12 should be full professors at "peer" institutions, which means institutions of the same or higher research caliber as your own. Typically most of them are highly distinguished, such as people who hold leadership positions in societies or journals or who have won major awards for their research.

The above is for promotion to associate professor. I believe that for promotion to full professor the number of letters is higher.

If you are interested in a particular institution, look up the rules in their faculty handbook (which is often publicly available).


The numbers vary enormously between universities and departments and, from my experience, seems to correspond at least roughly with the prestige (and tenure rate) of the institutions. At the very high end, I've met faculty in the humanities at both MIT and Columbia whose told me that their case required (or will soon require) 25 letters!

Many top large research schools including the large state university that currently employs me will request in the order of 4-8. I'm under the impression that the majority of universities will request between 2 and 5.

  • 1
    In my opinion, asking for 25 letters is an outrageous abuse of the academic community. It takes me at least a full workday to write a promotion evaluation, and unlike a manuscript review I feel that I have no choice but to accept lest my refusal be taken as a sign of low esteem for the candidate. Suppose that we grant them the right to ask for ten letters. Is asking for another 15 really providing enough information to justify using up a month's worth of research time from the community (assuming some teaching and service duties as well)? – Corvus Mar 10 '15 at 4:12
  • @Corvus I know one professor (at MIT actually) who spent a month reading through a candidate's work in detail to write him a single letter for promotion (at a top 10 large public school). – Kimball Mar 10 '15 at 4:25
  • @Corvus: I completely agree. I wasn't condoning the practice, I was just trying to answer the question. – Benjamin Mako Hill Mar 10 '15 at 5:34
  • @BenjaminMakoHill Understood. I'm certainly not trying to shoot the messenger! – Corvus Mar 10 '15 at 5:35
  • 1
    @DavidKetcheson: I agree. Although "Tier 1" is a bit ambiguous, it must be true that a majority of universities are not Tier 1. – Benjamin Mako Hill Mar 10 '15 at 14:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.