Do math journals consider a paper in which most of the content referred to another accepted but not yet published paper? In a case in which this is allowed, do one need to give a copy of the accepted paper to the editor of the target journal?
2 Answers
You can cite anything you want, regardless of whether it has been accepted for publication or even submitted. Of course citing preprints can make life more difficult for the referee, but there's no issue with accepted papers. They are considered just as reliable as published papers, since they've already gone through the refereeing process.
If you rely on a paper that is not yet publicly available, then you should provide a copy for the referee. However, if it's your own paper, then it's much better to post it online, for example through the arXiv. (If you supply a copy for the referee without posting it online, then it gives the impression that you are deliberately restricting access to the paper.)
-
Also, if submitting to a double-blind venue, the arXiv option is the only possible one, I think.– a3nmCommented May 12, 2015 at 23:36
This is definitely allowed in Computer Science. One way to cite the soon-to-be-published paper is, "To appear in ".
Here is an example. The authors develop a technique, write two papers, one on its theory and the other on the application, and submit the papers to suitable venues. The linked paper is the application paper. It often cites the theory paper which is the first entry in the bibliography at the end.
-
Is the first paper(may be not the final paper) appeared on arxiv or in a similiar repository?– KasvyCommented May 19, 2014 at 3:43
-
I cannot say. From my observation, Computer Science authors do not usually post on arxiv.– wsaleemCommented May 20, 2014 at 4:45
-
Some computer science authors do use arXiv. It depends on the institution and on the subfield. Others use other e-print repositories. (For instance, many people in crypto or security use eprint.iacr.org)– a3nmCommented May 12, 2015 at 23:37