1

I am a physics graduate student at the stage where I need to come up with a PhD thesis proposal.

I have an idea for a thesis project that I think is very interesting and has not been explored in the literature. Specifically, the idea is to take a powerful new numerical technique that was developed in a completely different field and try to apply it to problems in my own field. If it works, it could greatly impact the field by drastically reducing the computational cost of calculations, which is one of the biggest limitations of current research.

The problem I face is that this research would be exploratory in nature. By this I mean that I do not have a well-defined problem to solve beyond "attempt to adapt it to my field and establish how well it works on some basic problems". In contrast, every thesis I have read has consisted of applying known techniques to new problems. My approach would be to do the opposite: apply a new technique to known problems to establish whether it could be feasible as a new tool in my field.

So my question is: can exploratory studies such as this one constitute a PhD thesis? In my experience, I have never seen a thesis of this type, and I am worried that this is because it is a bad idea.

  • Well, those known techniques have to come from somewhere, don't they? Of course, if it doesn't work you don't have much of a thesis... – Jon Custer Jan 9 at 22:31
  • 5
    do you have an advisor? have you talked to you prospective committee members? have you talked to your institution physics department? what did they say? If you don't know who to talk to, ask your academic advisor for help, it's their job – aaaaa says reinstate Monica Jan 9 at 22:35
  • 2
    "every thesis I have read has consisted of applying known techniques to new problems" Those aren't great theses. – Anonymous Physicist Jan 9 at 23:08
  • 2
    "Drastically reducing the computational costs of calculations" by applying a new numerical technique to an old set of problems isn't "exploratory", it's just research (though if the outcomes are too obvious ahead of time then it may not be interesting research) - all good research has to have some element of uncertainty to be interesting. Yes, likely you should try some initial exploratory steps (effectively to see if your approach is feasible, but that's not what your thesis would be likely based on. – Bryan Krause Jan 10 at 0:15
  • 1
    I had a student who managed to adapt known methods to improve state-of-the-art results by several orders of magnitude. He was worried that this would not be original enough. He didn't need to. – Captain Emacs Jan 10 at 4:37
3

Yes. A PhD thesis that introduces new methods to old problems can be an excellent thesis if:

  • The new methods are in some way better than old methods.
  • The new methods are widely adopted.

Some of the most successful physicists work in this way.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.