Since a short time ago, I refuse to try solving math questions of which there is no solution available, unless I'm working on an own/open problem in my thesis. In subjects however, I refuse, because it is frustrating to get stuck for days and knowing that a solution exists. So knowing that I miss some important way of thinking.

Now you might think Why? If you can't solve it, just look at the course material and if that doesn't help then ask the teacher. Yes I tried that. By both mouth and mail. Unfortunately a lot of them don't like to get disturbed by students, because they are actually not real teachers, but very busy researchers who hardly have time for anything else. I also tried google, mathstack and asking students, but without a solution book it seems like it is always possible that nothing helps and you thus stay where you are: stuck.

Having said this, is there a way to learn without solution books but with the guarantee that you can always get access to the solution for the problem you work on? Maybe I do something wrong with the ways already tried?

  • 2
    This seems mostly to be a rant. I would suggest that self-assembled student study groups are often a good option, and many online-learning platforms have ways to do that.
    – Jon Custer
    Jun 28, 2019 at 16:31
  • Not every problem that exists has been solved yet. You may need to work at finding solutions...
    – Solar Mike
    Jun 28, 2019 at 16:52
  • 1
    So, research is about working things out... Learning comes from effort...
    – Solar Mike
    Jun 28, 2019 at 17:05
  • 1
    Yes, but I think effort is not all. We can also learn by looking at answers after we first try the exercise by ourself for, let's say, hours and don't manage. Then we not only see what we should have thought about to solve it, but I also discovered e.g. that thinking out-of-box is in general better than thinking in (sub-ways of) the same way. Jun 28, 2019 at 18:32
  • 2
    You do know that actual mathematicians sometimes work for years on a problem and never get anywhere, right? Jun 28, 2019 at 20:12

3 Answers 3


You should find someone who is willing to spend enough time helping you get unstuck. The generic answer is: asking classmates, asking professors, asking on MathStackexchange and MathOverflow. Of course when you ask a question you should have thought about what you really don't understand. Do you know the definitions? Are there similar examples in the book? Can you ask a simpler question that you don't know the answer to? If you spend some time with your book and you're not making progress then you should ask for help if there's no solutions manual.

is there a way to learn without solution books but with the guarantee that you can always get access to the solution for the problem you work on?

No. Ask people for help and hope that things will get resolved.


frustrating to get stuck for days and knowing that a solution exists. So knowing that I miss some important way of thinking.

So your solution to missing some important way of thinking is ... to not think at all?

If you try hard to solve a problem, you are learning. You learn what doesn't work and why. That's a valuable lesson, and it's how you get better. In fact, I'd venture to say if it takes you 4 days to solve a problem, then even if you don't end up solving it, you probably learned more than the person who solved it in 1 hour.

In mathematics, knowing the exact solution of some made-up problem usually isn't the key. After all, the exercise question tells you the conclusion of the solution. You already know the result from the onset. You just have to prove it, and it is the things you learn from proving it that are important, and that's my point: even if you don't manage to prove it, you still did worked with the details and learned similar concepts to the person who did manage to prove it. You just learned it slighty differently, e.g. somebody who proved it learned "okay, this technique works in this case", while you learned "okay, this technique doesn't work in this case". Both are equally valuable.

  • Ok, I agree that one can also learn by just trying and that only knowing the solution does not make your brain better. But don't we learn even more if we first try for hours (not days) a problem by ourself and if we can't solve it look at the answer? In this way, a building block (a think way you did not have before) can be added to our brain, isn't it? Jun 28, 2019 at 16:55
  • You say "Both are equally valuable": is this also if his technique is more complicated and thus lead to the solution? Jun 28, 2019 at 21:58

Actually, you will learn more without the hints provided by a solution, provided that you can find a way to get some feedback on your attempts. Perhaps your professor or someone else can provide that.

But you should investigate the Moore Method of teaching mathematics, created by Robert Lee Moore and used by some of his successors. It is, roughly, a discovery method of learning higher math with few hints (hmmm, no hints). Some of Moore's students have become outstanding mathematicians and educators.

The method sounds a bit brutal, of course.

However, if you are in a graduate program, you need to understand that being able to re-prove things that are already known is a lower level skill than true mathematics. Even being able to prove things never proven before, but having been given a good statement of the problem requires only a lower level of insight. But you have to achieve at least that before you can reach the highest level of insight - having a good idea of what might be proven and thus worthy of exploration.

I suggest you press on. But also that you find some way to get feedback. If you go wrong somewhere it is good to know where and why so that you don't develop misconceptions.

However, to avoid frustration, it is also useful to put hard problems aside for a while as you work on other things - or even just take a break. Trying to run your brain on "nitro" all the time leads to burn out and poor results. Give yourself a break in general, and specifically a break from any problem that is eluding you at the moment. Insight will likely come, but it can't be scheduled or forced.

For what it's worth, I don't think I had the "higher levels" of insight into mathematics until I'd completed by doctorate.

  • I certainly did not get the impression that the OP was a graduate student. More likely an undergrad doing a bachelor's thesis. But, I usually am wrong...
    – Jon Custer
    Jun 28, 2019 at 16:52
  • @JonCuster, Never too early to start working on insight, I guess.
    – Buffy
    Jun 28, 2019 at 17:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .