Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with anonymity
Search options not deleted
user 156433
Questions concerning systems where the identity of those involved is intended to be unknown, such as in double- or single-blind peer review.
-3
votes
Why write papers anonymously?
Why not?
Actually, why would anyone write not anonymously?
What's the real point behind a list of names, especially in a scientific article?
Papers are written for the purpose of the advancement of sc …
- 33
-4
votes
1
answer
195
views
What is the purpose of making authorship of scientific papers public? [closed]
Anonymity has the advantage of removing unnecessary bias. It draws the reader's attention on the subject without allowing it to check the authors' affiliations out. … Anonymity would be advantageous to the peer review process, too.
Authors could still be registered with the editor and would remain in any case responsible for what they write. …
- 33