Basically, it boils down to whether OP has a vested interest in the matter.
This can be as responsible officer or as bystander interested in the integrity of the process.
However, the "behind-the-scenes" information that OP gives makes them look like they are looking for material to create damage to the target person as punishment for other wrongdoings. Anything but initiating investigation and possible punishment for the specific misdeed in question is vigilantism and morally very problematic.
Cross-punishment in civilized societies is not permitted for very good reasons.
Concretely, if the person in question did plagiarize or other academic misdeeds, these should be reported as such to the relevant entities. If the person has a fraudulent employment status, that may not be OP's business, but it's also OP's right as upright citizen to report that.
But what I found very questionable is that OP seems to intend to cross-retaliate against the alleged academic misdeeds of the prof using a completely unrelated employment matter. That would be ethically very questionable and you would be playing private avenger.