Timeline for Why do universities tolerate uploading papers on their websites?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2018 at 20:21 | answer | added | Ar_lav | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 8, 2017 at 18:34 | comment | added | Mark | Many researchers and universities aren't biggest friends of publishers and therefore may not give a ... ... about some of the limitations publishers try to lay upon them. | |
| Dec 4, 2015 at 13:04 | comment | added | ypercubeᵀᴹ | I find very little resemblance between software I cracked (or movies I illegally downloaded) and a published article that I spent days or months to write. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 17:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/337252134179467264 | ||
| May 21, 2013 at 3:02 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 21, 2013 at 10:44 | |||||
| May 17, 2013 at 10:26 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | @All: It isn't obvious at all. For instance, in mathematics, every publisher I know allows authors to post papers on their own websites. | |
| May 14, 2013 at 7:37 | vote | accept | Googlebot | ||
| May 13, 2013 at 21:38 | comment | added | cbeleites | @All: it could also be a sign that e.g. the funding agencies and/or university require the researchers to make versions publicly available, and thus the journals were selected so that e.g. having at least preprint online (possibly x months after publication) is allowed. | |
| May 13, 2013 at 20:16 | comment | added | Googlebot | @Kaz when there are 200+ papers by different publishers, it is obvious that copyright issue has not been taken into account; otherwise, they should avoid at least a few papers in the list. | |
| May 13, 2013 at 19:55 | comment | added | Kaz | Indeed, how do you know it's copyright infringement? There is such at hing as non-exclusive licensing: you can redistribute it, but so can I. | |
| May 13, 2013 at 17:22 | history | edited | Piotr Migdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed title as it was misleading
|
| May 13, 2013 at 15:14 | answer | added | JeffE | timeline score: 117 | |
| May 13, 2013 at 12:26 | comment | added | aeismail | As Yuichiro Fujiwara indicates below, it's not automatically copyright infringement. For some journals it is, for others, it isn't. Absolutes rarely hold up in academia! | |
| May 13, 2013 at 12:24 | answer | added | Ben Norris | timeline score: 16 | |
| May 13, 2013 at 11:53 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 13, 2013 at 14:04 | |||||
| May 13, 2013 at 10:46 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | Even ignoring all the other arguments, why should the university take action proactively? It's the publisher's job to issue a DMCA takedown, under US law (where it applies). | |
| May 13, 2013 at 10:24 | answer | added | Yuichiro Fujiwara | timeline score: 52 | |
| May 13, 2013 at 8:44 | history | asked | Googlebot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |