Timeline for How should I deal with critical comment that may affect on my research path? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2017 at 20:44 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Aug 29, 2017 at 8:51 | |||||
| Aug 28, 2017 at 7:59 | vote | accept | Mohammad nagdawi | ||
| Aug 18, 2017 at 2:16 | history | closed |
Scott Seidman Alexandros Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩 user67075 Nobody |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 20:35 | comment | added | Fomite | @Mehrdad There are other, far more innocuous explanations. If the screen shot is a threaded conversation, the OP has already gotten an answer, and they may feel they may not have more to contribute. Or they suspect the field has moved on, and may not have advice that they think is still relevant. Or they're busy, and don't feel like helping someone with a side project they've long since left behind. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 18:07 | comment | added | user541686 | @nagdawi: He didn't respond because he didn't want to give you his code. Contrary to their public opinions on whether others should release their code, researchers are not always happy to just send you a copy. What do they get in return? If the code is poorly written or if you find a bug, they may feel embarrassed—or you may be someone who might embarrass them. And if the code is good, they might want to retain the ability to use it for commercial advantage later. None of this should critically affect your research direction. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 17:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 18, 2017 at 2:16 | |||||
| Aug 17, 2017 at 17:38 | comment | added | errantlinguist | I have no idea what is meant by this question and I personally think the author of said paper would not be happy to have screenshots of online conversations with them be publicized in strange SE questions which are hard to understand... | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 16:13 | comment | added | Mohammad nagdawi | @VladimirF the commenter isn't the paper's author. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 16:10 | comment | added | Mohammad nagdawi | @Angew the comment didn't post by the paper's author. Interestingly, the comment writer has 2 papers in multimodal image registration the latest one in 2009. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 16:00 | comment | added | Vladimir F Героям слава | How can Q1 journal accept to publish insulated work? Why shouldn't the journal accept it if it is good? There is nothing bad at all about an isolated work. It just means that the authors do not work on this topic any more. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 12:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/898155588353499136 | ||
| Aug 17, 2017 at 11:36 | comment | added | J... | I think it would help if we knew what you think "insulated" means here. It's not really clear what you are worried about. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 11:35 | comment | added | Ander Biguri | Why would a Q1 journal not accept a paper because the author does not generally work on that field? They will just have a look and if its good accept it. To repeat what other people said: The paper itself is good, the author is telling you that he/she does not work on that topic, so they can not help you. The paper itself has absolutely not problem (at least none is shown in this interaction) | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 11:23 | comment | added | Angew is no longer proud of SO | Was the "insulated work" comment really by another researcher? The comment reads as if it was made by the paper's author (or at least by the one to which you addressed the question). Can you clarify the situation? | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 10:42 | history | edited | Mohammad nagdawi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 63 characters in body
|
| Aug 17, 2017 at 10:38 | comment | added | Mohammad nagdawi | @Nat I read the word correctly but my worry come from this comment because I don't want to put effort on work no one accept to publish. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 9:22 | answer | added | XavierStuvw | timeline score: 11 | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 2:13 | answer | added | Fomite | timeline score: 41 | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 1:43 | history | asked | Mohammad nagdawi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |