Timeline for Extent of reuse and reanalysis of data published by others
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2019 at 12:20 | comment | added | RQM | @IanSudbey: I don't know what "culturally" is supposed to mean in this context, but your last sentence is most definitely wrong; that's why, for example, licenses exist, i.e. to define what you're permitted to do with published material and what you're prohibited from doing. Let's hope your advice ("free to do as you wish") doesn't cause anyone trouble! | |
| Aug 19, 2019 at 15:48 | comment | added | Ian Sudbery | @RQM Legally your are right, we can't know the legal position of any specific jurisdiction. However, culturally MaartenBuis is completely correct. Once something is published it is regarded as pubilc domain and you are free to do with it as you wish, as long as you cite the original publication. | |
| Jan 31, 2018 at 18:22 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jan 1, 2018 at 18:14 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 2, 2017 at 23:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/937095443720364032 | ||
| Dec 2, 2017 at 17:16 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 2, 2017 at 16:56 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 3, 2017 at 16:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 16:32 | comment | added | RQM | @MaartenBuis: That's a very strong statement to make, and in this generality, I would guess it's most probably wrong. Understanding the applicable laws and contracts would be complicated enough if one knew the jurisdiction, but it seems like we don't, so a sweeping statement like that is unlikely to stand. | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 15:38 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 18:32 | comment | added | Maarten Buis | You can do anything with previously published data without consent from the authors. Problem is finding something interesting and new enough that warrants such a publication. | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 15:14 | history | edited | Joce | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 14:39 | answer | added | Scott Seidman | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 13:10 | history | asked | Joce | CC BY-SA 3.0 |