Timeline for What are best practices for reviewing peer research lab colleagues' work for a supervisor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:34 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @Emilie Got it. No problem with feeling responsible: I think that's the mark of a good collaborator (i.e., someone who isn't just out for their own publication record), just know the limits of that. You will have to navigate the egos of the newer members of the lab, and also remember that you have to build a relationship with them as well - your supervisor might trust you, but they don't yet. I would advise you to be careful with your seniority status, to keep it in your head that you are still a peer, just with a little more experience. That will help you automatically shift your tone. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:16 | comment | added | curious | Great answer! I'm not literally responsible for the final outcome but I feel responsible at least. I wasn't aware "golden student" status was a thing! I might have been on my way to acquiring this status but I fixed that by having a kid. :-) More seriously though, I am one of the most "senior" member of the lab regardless of my "juniorness" in academia because the supervisor is fairly new faculty. So students with more research experience can start working in the lab but are not as aware of the work that has been done since the beginning. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:05 | history | edited | Bryan Krause♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 16:49 | history | answered | Bryan Krause♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |