Timeline for What are best practices for reviewing peer research lab colleagues' work for a supervisor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 13:24 | comment | added | curious | @DirkLiebhold Usually I'm asked if I'm ok with reviewing, and the students get an email saying I will be offering feedback on the work in which I am CCed. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 13:23 | comment | added | curious | @DirkLiebhold Like Massimo emphasized, it's in research lab assignments (e.g. identifying gaps in literature reviews). There is an impact ultimately on the student when they don't address my comments (e.g. supervisor gets annoyed because she wants them addressed), not in terms of their work or their grades but, in my understanding, in terms of if they are more or less likely to get future lab work. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 10:10 | comment | added | Dirk | @MassimoOrtolano Still, there should be something similar, e.g. the decision who is allowed to visit the upcoming conference, etc. The supervisor surely has some "power" to hand over. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 10:08 | comment | added | Massimo Ortolano | Since the context is that of a research lab, the issue is probably not that of grades. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 9:52 | history | answered | Dirk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |