Timeline for Is the journal "The Winnower" scientifically trustworthy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2017 at 21:06 | answer | added | Fomite | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 11, 2017 at 20:57 | comment | added | Fomite | @JeffE This bears repeating. There is a citation in a very good journal to WoWWiki, because I put it there. | |
| S Aug 10, 2017 at 16:02 | history | suggested | James Hawley | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Minor wording change, linking journal site
|
| Aug 10, 2017 at 14:40 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 10, 2017 at 16:02 | |||||
| Aug 10, 2017 at 12:26 | comment | added | JeffE | Articles can be cited no matter where, or even whether, they are published. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 6:41 | comment | added | kryomaxim | I mean with "thrustworthy" that articles in The Winnower may be accepted by scientific workers such that These articles can be cited. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 18:16 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | What do you mean by "trustworthy"? In what specific way are you looking to "trust" the joural? | |
| Jul 31, 2017 at 23:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/892163673573216256 | ||
| Jul 31, 2017 at 18:31 | history | edited | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling corrections
|
| Jul 30, 2017 at 12:53 | comment | added | GEdgar | I'm thinking it should not be considered different than arxiv as far as "trustworthy" ... that is: "no". | |
| Jul 30, 2017 at 12:22 | history | asked | kryomaxim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |