Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 5, 2017 at 22:38 comment added jakebeal @FredDouglis Well-observed processes are a wonderful thing, but I've rarely observed them in action in the looser scientific activities of universities and startups.
Jun 4, 2017 at 19:21 comment added Fred Douglis Just because it happens doesn't mean it's reasonable. I know that in every company I've worked for, there's a formal process for submitting a paper, which includes addressing the question of whether any necessary patents have been filed. If an author suddenly decides they failed to file a patent, and asks a publisher to delay publication, they screwed up. IMHO and YMMV.
Jun 4, 2017 at 18:33 comment added jakebeal @FredDouglis In my experience, lots of things can change over the course of a long review and revision process, particularly with busy people and multi-institution collaborative teams. I myself have been surprised in the past by late-breaking patent filings by collaborators.
Jun 4, 2017 at 15:39 comment added Fred Douglis I don't think a patent is a good reason. If you don't sort that out when you submit, you have no business submitting.
Jun 4, 2017 at 13:54 vote accept George Welder
Jun 4, 2017 at 13:33 history answered jakebeal CC BY-SA 3.0