Timeline for Do I need to cite Mathematica in my paper?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2018 at 4:05 | answer | added | Jeromy Anglim | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 8, 2018 at 2:44 | answer | added | Hasek | timeline score: -2 | |
| Sep 7, 2018 at 22:16 | answer | added | usr1234567 | timeline score: -1 | |
| Sep 7, 2018 at 20:47 | answer | added | Fomite | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 7, 2018 at 17:40 | answer | added | Paul Saturday | timeline score: 8 | |
| May 11, 2017 at 15:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/862693321998815232 | ||
| May 10, 2017 at 4:55 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | In my experience(neuroscience) it is typical to refer to the analysis software you use in your methodology, mentioning at least the software version and company, but not typically included in the list of references (this is the same approach used for physical technical equipment, such as amplifiers, key microscope components, etc). Something like "Simulations were performed in Mathematica Version 11.1, Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL." | |
| May 10, 2017 at 4:38 | answer | added | user1482 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 9, 2017 at 16:52 | comment | added | Penguin_Knight | FYI: support.wolfram.com/kb/472 in case you decided to. | |
| May 9, 2017 at 15:23 | answer | added | asquared | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 9, 2017 at 14:32 | review | First posts | |||
| May 9, 2017 at 14:37 | |||||
| May 9, 2017 at 14:29 | history | asked | confusedstudent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |