Timeline for Why don't all disciplines follow a double-blind review system?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2017 at 10:18 | comment | added | a3nm | Just because you may be able to de-anonymize the submission doesn't mean that double-blind reviewing is worthless. As a reviewer, I prefer the submission itself to be double-blind, so I'm sure I won't be biased by the author's reputation or that of their institutions; and I will not try to identify them, at least not before I have reached a final decision on the submission. | |
| Mar 27, 2013 at 7:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 27, 2013 at 8:47 | |||||
| Mar 27, 2013 at 7:17 | history | answered | adhalanay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |