Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 24, 2017 at 14:28 comment added Anonymous Mathematician I would be opposed to such a feature. For published work, the journal reference field is already there for the full publication details, including the date. For most unpublished work, the date it first appeared is not really a precise concept. (Does it mean the first date you showed it to anyone? The date you made the final edits? The date you posted it to a previous website?) Theses are one of the few cases that have a widely agreed upon date but that don't fit the journal reference field very well, and I don't think it's worth introducing a special field primarily for them.
Apr 24, 2017 at 9:06 comment added einpoklum @PeteL.Clark: Because it's not just comment text, it's a structural field, and is often just as important as when you've uploaded your file.
Apr 24, 2017 at 9:00 comment added famargar @PeteL.Clark as per my comment above: I would not like to raise attention to an old piece of work. On the other hand, I do would like to have a chance to store my PhD in a publicly accessible place, the same way as my younger colleagues have done in more recent times. According to the number of upvotes, this feature seems like of popular interest!
Apr 23, 2017 at 21:07 comment added Pete L. Clark You can already add the publication information of the preprint in the comments. (Many people go back and add this when the paper is published; many don't.) So I don't see why a new feature is really necessary.
Apr 23, 2017 at 20:09 history answered einpoklum CC BY-SA 3.0