Timeline for Does suggesting potential reviewers for one's submitted paper increase the likelihood of the paper being accepted?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28 at 15:52 | answer | added | David White | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 14, 2021 at 3:53 | comment | added | Sursula | One journal I sent one of my articles to had the requirement of naming 4 potential reviewers. If you did not name any or not enough, your submission was not accepted. I don't know if this is the case with other journals as well, but in this instance, it did not improve your chances at all. | |
| Apr 25, 2017 at 4:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/856727804058234880 | ||
| Apr 23, 2017 at 23:40 | comment | added | Kimball | I highly doubt there has been a study on this, and you will not get more than ancedotal evidence such as in the post I linked to above. | |
| Apr 23, 2017 at 23:39 | comment | added | Kimball | @JonCuster However, the ancedotal evidence here: academia.stackexchange.com/q/10474/19607 suggests that suggesting reviewers lowers the likelihood of a paper being accepted (interpreted in an appropriate statistical sense). | |
| Apr 23, 2017 at 20:40 | comment | added | Fred Douglis | Suggested reviewers are often a path to collusion as well. I don't think naming them helps your chances. | |
| Apr 23, 2017 at 18:47 | comment | added | Jon Custer | Being in a position to suggest reviewers probably means you are integrated in to your research community and accepted within it. One's prior success is likely the best predictor of future success. | |
| Apr 23, 2017 at 17:42 | history | asked | Franck Dernoncourt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |