Timeline for Falsely accused of providing project code to others in a class
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2018 at 22:09 | comment | added | Dawn | If the same TA helped each of you, then that seems like it could account for the similarities... | |
| Apr 5, 2017 at 5:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/849492789712891904 | ||
| Mar 30, 2017 at 14:36 | answer | added | StrongBad | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 30, 2017 at 8:35 | comment | added | whyyyyyy | Yes I believe so. She told me her professor informed her of being flagged by the autograder, and also provided evidence from the code which makes him think it was cheating. The case was sent to the officials. The professor also sent the information to our professor. | |
| Mar 30, 2017 at 8:29 | comment | added | svavil | Was the other person just flagged by the autograder (does not require human intervention, high probability of being mistakenly flagged) or indeed accused of misconduct by university officials? | |
| Mar 30, 2017 at 8:26 | comment | added | whyyyyyy | Hi, thanks for replying. I think we will be accused just because someone is already accused of copying our code, and from similar cases I heard about, people who are suspected to have provided the code will also be investigated for a misconduct. | |
| Mar 30, 2017 at 8:22 | history | edited | whyyyyyy |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 30, 2017 at 8:22 | comment | added | svavil | ...similar in logic, and some shorter functions are almost the same. Unless your investigation team is unusually strict, this does not seem to be grounds for a misconduct. If I read your post correctly, no one accused you yet. Do you have other reasons to believe you will be accused at all? | |
| Mar 30, 2017 at 8:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 30, 2017 at 10:18 | |||||
| Mar 30, 2017 at 8:12 | history | asked | whyyyyyy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |