Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 31, 2017 at 6:22 comment added Dan Fox @O.R.Mapper: It means one has a mutually recognized relation with the institution in which it is understood that one's research activity forms part of that relation. This can be contractual, honorary, etc. What would be dishonest is to represent that one works at XYZ when one visited XYZ 4 years ago. Some people represent themselves as affiliated with a certain institution because that affiliation gives credibility they might not otherwise have.
Mar 31, 2017 at 3:25 vote accept Lesnar
Mar 30, 2017 at 14:10 answer added daniel.heydebreck timeline score: 3
Mar 30, 2017 at 13:03 comment added O. R. Mapper @DanFox: What does it mean for an affiliation to "exist"? Isn't both sides verbally agreeing to work together enough?
Mar 30, 2017 at 11:19 answer added Nicole Ruggiano timeline score: 3
Mar 30, 2017 at 10:46 answer added Danny Ruijters timeline score: 10
Mar 30, 2017 at 10:41 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/847398264416620546
Mar 30, 2017 at 8:19 comment added zibadawa timmy Do the answers here address your question? The short answer is that your affiliation needs to accurately reflect the most current affiliation that supported the research. A job in industry will likely not leave you much time to do research that's completely independent of that job and the company's resources, so they should be your default affiliation.
Mar 30, 2017 at 7:33 comment added Dan Fox It seems dishonest to indicate an affiliation that does not exist.
Mar 30, 2017 at 6:24 comment added O. R. Mapper What does the institution/group you claim to be affiliated with think? Do they still see you as "someone associated with their team"?
Mar 30, 2017 at 5:51 history asked Lesnar CC BY-SA 3.0