Timeline for How should I reference a repository of data and resources created to accompany my publication?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 6:02 | comment | added | Ben | That's right, I'm doing something like option 3 from your list of 'Where to put this citation/reference?' I've edited my answer to clarify where the paragraph comes from, and what the citation is. Probably every research discipline should have at least one paper like my Marwick (2016) to show members of the community some of the open science options that are relevant to their ways of working. | |
| Mar 29, 2017 at 5:58 | history | edited | Ben | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 729 characters in body
|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 2:48 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | Just to clarify, the paper you are quoting is Marwick et al (2017). Presumably the earlier Marwick (2016) paper is a side point. Most people would not have such a paper where they have published on reproducible methods. They would just be writing a standard paper with a repository that accompanies it. | |
| Mar 29, 2017 at 2:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 29, 2017 at 7:09 | |||||
| Mar 29, 2017 at 2:21 | history | edited | Ben | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 45 characters in body
|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 2:20 | history | edited | Jeromy Anglim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added quotations
|
| Mar 29, 2017 at 2:18 | history | answered | Ben | CC BY-SA 3.0 |