Timeline for Is it necessary to include and update the status of a paper on arXiv once it has been accepted for publication in a journal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2016 at 2:33 | comment | added | tkr | If you are on the job market then you have letter writers who can write "they submitted to blah blah"...you just have to tell your writers where you submitted (which you should?) | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 15:29 | comment | added | Anonymous Mathematician | I think Tom Church is right that it can come across as tacky, but if you are on the job market or up for tenure, then tackiness is a risk worth taking. | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 15:18 | comment | added | JeffE | I agree with @Henry. Especially if you are on the job market or up for tenure. | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 14:43 | comment | added | Henry | I want to disagree with the first paragraph: "Submitted to Journal of Blah" does convey information, namely, it conveys information about what you think about the paper, in the form of where you thought it appropriate to submit. (My CV used to omit that information, and I was advised to include it, for precisely this reason.) | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 12:52 | history | edited | Anonymous Mathematician | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added link to jref information on arXiv
|
| Mar 15, 2013 at 12:50 | comment | added | Anonymous Mathematician | @Juan: even if the referees found no errors, if they suggested small changes (or you made other changes yourself) it is best to update the arXiv version to include them, as suggested by David Ketcheson. | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 5:58 | comment | added | Tom Church | Updating the comments causes a new version to appear (and a new mailing to be sent out), whether or not there are any changes to the paper itself. I prefer not to do this any more than I have to. | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 5:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 15, 2013 at 8:50 | |||||
| Mar 15, 2013 at 5:53 | comment | added | Juan | Thank you for your comments. What about if one doesn't update the preprint and include something like "The results in this paper will appear in..." in the comments anyway? I believe this would be OK as long as referees didn't point out any errors in the paper, otherwise one should update the preprint in order to correct them. | |
| Mar 15, 2013 at 5:37 | history | answered | Tom Church | CC BY-SA 3.0 |