Timeline for Usages of "sic" when citing old spelling
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2017 at 21:37 | comment | added | eykanal | At the very least, this should cite the wikipedia page you took it from. Cleaning up the quote (removing the bracketed numbers, etc) wouldn't hurt either. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 19:49 | comment | added | Raydot | Because this one came up in a review, hence comment added to improve this particular response. I'm certainly not out to get anyone. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 18:37 | comment | added | user9646 | @DaveKaye None of the other answers cite style guides, why are they not subject to the same degree of skepticism? | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 18:18 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Mar 8, 2017 at 1:01 | |||||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 18:03 | comment | added | Raydot | With all due respect, it would be better were this explanation to come from one of the style guides mentioned and not Wikipedia. | |
| Mar 7, 2017 at 17:53 | review | Late answers | |||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 18:16 | |||||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 17:29 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 17:36 | |||||
| Mar 7, 2017 at 17:27 | history | answered | Declan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |