Timeline for Acknowledging a reviewer from a journal from which the paper was rejected
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2018 at 18:02 | history | protected | Alexandros | ||
| Mar 11, 2013 at 17:05 | answer | added | StasK | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 5:15 | answer | added | JRN | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 11, 2013 at 1:03 | comment | added | Piotr Migdal | let us continue this discussion in chat | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 23:06 | vote | accept | Piotr Migdal | ||
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:56 | answer | added | Tara B | timeline score: 14 | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:37 | comment | added | Piotr Migdal | @TaraB Thx! So, please write it as an answer. :) | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/310881711036719104 | ||
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:23 | comment | added | Tara B | Right, then I really think that should be sufficient in this case, especially given the difficulty of making it clear you are thanking a reviewer from a different journal while not mentioning any names or the fact the paper was rejected! | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:20 | comment | added | Piotr Migdal | @TaraB I always try to thank reviewers (and especially when they understood it... or didn't but it is visible that they were trying), so most likely I sent a message to editor. | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:14 | comment | added | Tara B | Ah. I don't think it is really necessary to mention that. It's helpful, but not something that made a major improvement to the paper. Have you considered simply asking the journal editor to pass your thanks on directly to the reviewer? | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:10 | comment | added | Piotr Migdal | @TaraB Mostly small fixes (grammar, typos, small changes), distributed among whole paper. | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:06 | comment | added | Tara B | Is it the case that you are wanting to mention the specific part of your paper that arose from the earlier reviewer's remarks (rather than a more general acknowledgement as suggested in Peter Jansson's answer)? | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 22:01 | history | edited | Piotr Migdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
two remarks
|
| Mar 10, 2013 at 21:41 | answer | added | Peter Jansson | timeline score: 23 | |
| Mar 10, 2013 at 21:29 | history | edited | Piotr Migdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 10, 2013 at 21:22 | history | asked | Piotr Migdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |