Timeline for Is submitting two papers with identical introduction and methods considered plagiarism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 29, 2017 at 14:07 | answer | added | Dasapta Erwin Irawan | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 2, 2017 at 17:05 | comment | added | Nikey Mike | Don't do this, the self-plagiarism could cause retraction. | |
Jan 2, 2017 at 8:32 | comment | added | user9482 | Regardless whether it is plagiarism it's also bad style and as a reviewer I wouldn't stand for it. | |
Jan 2, 2017 at 7:57 | answer | added | aparente001 | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 18:57 | answer | added | user6846880 | timeline score: -1 | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 17:40 | answer | added | einpoklum | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 10:57 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/815149941991555072 | ||
Dec 30, 2016 at 21:45 | answer | added | David Schwartz | timeline score: -1 | |
Dec 30, 2016 at 18:13 | answer | added | Pete L. Clark | timeline score: 19 | |
Dec 30, 2016 at 18:04 | answer | added | Anonymous Mathematician | timeline score: 28 | |
Dec 30, 2016 at 16:50 | answer | added | Bryan Krause♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 30, 2016 at 16:45 | history | edited | Penguin_Knight | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body; edited title
|
Dec 30, 2016 at 16:36 | comment | added | Inde | If both papers are so similar, why not publish as one paper with 2 experiments? Doing so would allow you to shorten the entire document by reducing the intro and methods sections. If published as you describe, you would be committing self-plagiarism. | |
Dec 30, 2016 at 14:33 | history | asked | explorer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |