Timeline for Is improving a simple algorithm without beating the state of the art still publishable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2017 at 15:47 | vote | accept | etal | ||
| Dec 19, 2016 at 19:31 | comment | added | Tommy | I would check out a "letters" track of a conference (e.g., "Operations Research Letters". Usually these are shorter papers for this type of thing. | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 1:15 | history | edited | Dirk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 158 characters in body
|
| Dec 18, 2016 at 4:05 | comment | added | keshlam | Computer science is the one area where anything less than an order if magnitude improvement is often considered uninteresting... | |
| Dec 17, 2016 at 23:30 | comment | added | Massimo Ortolano | I'm not familiar with the mathematical community, but in other communities a possibility would be that of submitting a short communication, or equivalent. | |
| Dec 17, 2016 at 22:09 | comment | added | Ian | One problem the referees of the publications the “community of practitioners” read, are likely to be the experts that can understand the state of the art…. | |
| Dec 17, 2016 at 18:23 | history | answered | Dirk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |