Timeline for Should I publish my first paper in a conference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2016 at 21:49 | comment | added | Daniel | @Paulo: The first source for conference quality in CS is the database maintained by Computing Research and Education Association of Australasia. Unlike many other "lists of good conferences", they have a clearly defined and frequently evaluated method to do their ranking. ICITST is not in their database, though, which, however, is not necessarily a bad sign. The second source to check is the acceptance rate of past instances. You can find this in the preface of the proceedings. Roughly, an acceptance rate < 20% maps to A and < 35% to B level. | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:38 | comment | added | Paulo | This is the 11th year for the conference , i found their previous years (from 2012 to 2015) proceedings in Ieee explore | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:34 | comment | added | Ian | Well, that is often difficult to find out. Criteria that might help you decide are: Has the conference existed for a long time? Have known scientists contributed? Have you read any of the papers published there and how did you deem their quality? | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:12 | vote | accept | Paulo | ||
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:12 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:10 | comment | added | Paulo | Thank you very much, the problem is i don't know if the conference is good or not . | |
| Oct 12, 2016 at 12:07 | history | answered | Ian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |