Timeline for Is it plagiarism (or bad practice) to cite reviews instead of source material directly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2016 at 13:15 | comment | added | BioGeo | It might be field related, but I always had the feeling that reviews in biological sciences get more citations than the original works. That's why everyone, journals and people, are always interested in writing a review (even if they are not really good at it). | |
| Oct 11, 2016 at 12:18 | history | answered | Christian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |