Timeline for Is it plagiarism (or bad practice) to cite reviews instead of source material directly? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
30 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://academia.stackexchange.com/ with https://academia.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Feb 5, 2017 at 20:01 | vote | accept | j91 | ||
Oct 18, 2016 at 10:38 | history | closed |
user2390246 Nobody 410 gone Cape Code Bob Brown |
Duplicate of Is it okay to incorporate a block of citations from a review paper into my own paper?, Referencing the reference? | |
Oct 18, 2016 at 3:09 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 18, 2016 at 10:38 | |||||
Oct 13, 2016 at 18:27 | answer | added | kwah | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 13, 2016 at 12:51 | answer | added | user60879 | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 11, 2016 at 13:57 | answer | added | zbicyclist | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 11, 2016 at 12:18 | answer | added | Christian | timeline score: 2 | |
S Oct 11, 2016 at 11:57 | history | suggested | terdon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited
|
Oct 11, 2016 at 11:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 11, 2016 at 11:57 | |||||
Oct 11, 2016 at 10:52 | history | edited | gman |
added citations tag
|
|
Oct 11, 2016 at 10:28 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 11, 2016 at 12:59 | |||||
Oct 11, 2016 at 10:24 | history | edited | j91 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 339 characters in body
|
Oct 11, 2016 at 5:53 | comment | added | henning no longer feeds AI | A very similar question has been aswered here: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47492/… | |
S Oct 11, 2016 at 3:34 | history | suggested | smci | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarification
|
Oct 11, 2016 at 3:22 | answer | added | Mohammad nagdawi | timeline score: -2 | |
Oct 11, 2016 at 2:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Oct 11, 2016 at 3:34 | |||||
Oct 10, 2016 at 22:49 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/785613220585275392 | ||
Oct 10, 2016 at 21:40 | answer | added | Jakub Konieczny | timeline score: 7 | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 20:52 | comment | added | David Richerby | The question in your title (is it plagiarism to cite reviews?) is very different from the question in the body (is it plagiarism to write your introduction by paraphrasing reviews?). | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 20:08 | comment | added | BioGeo | I usually avoid using (and citing) reviews, unless it's a new subject I need to get some understanding. I prefer making sure that the original references say what I want to use in my paper, plus they actually did the work. I only cite reviews when I "use" the conclusion or the opinion of the authors of the review. | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 14:22 | history | edited | j91 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 74 characters in body
|
Oct 10, 2016 at 12:04 | comment | added | j91 | @TheBigH Yes, that is a good option that sometimes I resource to. But it is not something I can do for every point I want to bring about. My question is more general. | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 12:03 | answer | added | Peter Jansson | timeline score: 27 | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:52 | comment | added | TheBigH | You could also consider wording along the lines of "...of the functional significance of chromatin loops (see Misteli 2007 and references therein)" | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:39 | answer | added | Davidmh | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:29 | history | edited | j91 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:20 | history | edited | j91 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:16 | review | First posts | |||
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:25 | |||||
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:14 | history | asked | j91 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |