Skip to main content
30 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://academia.stackexchange.com/ with https://academia.stackexchange.com/
Feb 5, 2017 at 20:01 vote accept j91
Oct 18, 2016 at 10:38 history closed user2390246
Nobody
410 gone
Cape Code
Bob Brown
Duplicate of Is it okay to incorporate a block of citations from a review paper into my own paper?, Referencing the reference?
Oct 18, 2016 at 3:09 review Close votes
Oct 18, 2016 at 10:38
Oct 13, 2016 at 18:27 answer added kwah timeline score: 0
Oct 13, 2016 at 12:51 answer added user60879 timeline score: 0
Oct 11, 2016 at 13:57 answer added zbicyclist timeline score: 3
Oct 11, 2016 at 12:18 answer added Christian timeline score: 2
S Oct 11, 2016 at 11:57 history suggested terdon CC BY-SA 3.0
Copy edited
Oct 11, 2016 at 11:41 review Suggested edits
S Oct 11, 2016 at 11:57
Oct 11, 2016 at 10:52 history edited gman
added citations tag
Oct 11, 2016 at 10:28 review Close votes
Oct 11, 2016 at 12:59
Oct 11, 2016 at 10:24 history edited j91 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 339 characters in body
Oct 11, 2016 at 5:53 comment added henning no longer feeds AI A very similar question has been aswered here: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47492/…
S Oct 11, 2016 at 3:34 history suggested smci CC BY-SA 3.0
clarification
Oct 11, 2016 at 3:22 answer added Mohammad nagdawi timeline score: -2
Oct 11, 2016 at 2:22 review Suggested edits
S Oct 11, 2016 at 3:34
Oct 10, 2016 at 22:49 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/785613220585275392
Oct 10, 2016 at 21:40 answer added Jakub Konieczny timeline score: 7
Oct 10, 2016 at 20:52 comment added David Richerby The question in your title (is it plagiarism to cite reviews?) is very different from the question in the body (is it plagiarism to write your introduction by paraphrasing reviews?).
Oct 10, 2016 at 20:08 comment added BioGeo I usually avoid using (and citing) reviews, unless it's a new subject I need to get some understanding. I prefer making sure that the original references say what I want to use in my paper, plus they actually did the work. I only cite reviews when I "use" the conclusion or the opinion of the authors of the review.
Oct 10, 2016 at 14:22 history edited j91 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 74 characters in body
Oct 10, 2016 at 12:04 comment added j91 @TheBigH Yes, that is a good option that sometimes I resource to. But it is not something I can do for every point I want to bring about. My question is more general.
Oct 10, 2016 at 12:03 answer added Peter Jansson timeline score: 27
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:52 comment added TheBigH You could also consider wording along the lines of "...of the functional significance of chromatin loops (see Misteli 2007 and references therein)"
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:39 answer added Davidmh timeline score: 2
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:29 history edited j91 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:20 history edited j91 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 3 characters in body
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:16 review First posts
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:25
Oct 10, 2016 at 11:14 history asked j91 CC BY-SA 3.0