Timeline for Authorship;first,second,co [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://academia.stackexchange.com/ with https://academia.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 4, 2016 at 8:12 | comment | added | Nobody | Please specify your field in your question. The authorship is very much field dependent. | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 8:08 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 4, 2016 at 8:32 | |||||
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 | history | edited | LeastSquaresWonderer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 102 characters in body
|
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:48 | history | closed |
Cape Code CommunityBot |
Duplicate of Compiling ethical standards for coauthorship across academic fields and regions | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:48 | comment | added | LeastSquaresWonderer | Thank you, your comments, and the possible duplicate answered my question. | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:32 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:50 | |||||
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:25 | comment | added | Tobias Kildetoft | The order of authors is the order in which they are listed on the publication (reading from left to right as always). In math and theoretical CS, nobody cares which place in the order you are (since as I said, it is alphabetical rather than by contribution). | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:23 | comment | added | LeastSquaresWonderer | @TobiasKildetoft Yes, I am. How is first, second authorship notated than? Or is it the case, that is is not. | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 7:02 | answer | added | Mohammad nagdawi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 6:54 | comment | added | Tobias Kildetoft | If you mean that you are in either math or CS (by the last sentence), then the authors should be listed alphabetically. Who should be corresponding author is just deciding who wishes to deal with the journal. | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 6:49 | comment | added | Nobody | I took out LaTex tag because it is no longer relevant. | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 6:47 | history | edited | Nobody |
Took out ir-relavant LaTex tag
|
|
| Oct 4, 2016 at 6:09 | comment | added | LeastSquaresWonderer | I have edited the title and the body. Thank you for your comment. Might you offer an insight on ordering? I think you cleared up the corresponding author issue already. | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 6:07 | history | edited | LeastSquaresWonderer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 56 characters in body
|
| Oct 4, 2016 at 5:58 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | First author, second author, corresponding author: They're all authors. Whenever there is more than one author, all authors are co-authors in relation to each other. Corresponding author is one author and can be assigned to any authorial position. The LaTeX issue is a minor technical issue that has no relationship with the fundamental question of (a) who should be corresponding author? (b) What should the order of authorship be? I feel like you may want to edit your question to focus probably on the basic questions of author order and who goes corresponding author. | |
| Oct 4, 2016 at 5:51 | history | edited | LeastSquaresWonderer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Oct 4, 2016 at 5:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 4, 2016 at 6:49 | |||||
| Oct 4, 2016 at 5:44 | history | asked | LeastSquaresWonderer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |